Appellate Decisions

Supreme Court Rules That Workers’ Compensation Insurers May Not Pursue Subrogation Claims Directly Against Third Party Tortfeasors

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled today - in a 3 to 2 decision - that Section 319 of the Workers' Compensation Act, 77 P.S. 671, does not permit employers/insurers to commence an action directly against third party torfeasors. The decision, in Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Domtar Paper Co., affirmed the…

Read More

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Statutory Limit on Damages Recoverable Against Local Government Agencies

In Zauflik v. Pennsbury School District, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the damages cap of $500,000 applicable to claims against local government agencies under the Tort Claims Act, 42 Pa. C.S. §§ 8501-8564.  The case involved a school student who suffered severe and permanent injuries when she…

Read More

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability

In a much anticipated opinion, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court finally held that Pennsylvania will not depart from the strict liability standard for product liability cases set forth in Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.  In recent years, a divide arose between those favoring the existing strict liability standard…

Read More

Commonwealth Court Imposes its Own Interpretation Over an Arbitrator’s Interpretation

One of the first things they teach you in an arbitration class is that the Court may not overturn an arbitration award merely because it disagrees with the arbitrator’s reasoning. But, the Court did just that in School District of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Local 3. On July…

Read More

No Discovery of Communications Between Counsel and Experts

On July 10, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erased any doubt that it intended to bar all discovery of communications between counsel and experts by amending Pa.R.Civ.P. 4003.5 to prohibit such communications. The amendment, effective August 9, 2014, confirms the Supreme Court’s Opinion in Support of Affirmance in Barrick v.…

Read More

Pa. Supreme Court Limits the Cost of Obtaining Medical Records – A Victory for the Consumer

On June 16th, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court favored litigants with limited funds over companies trying to make a profit reproducing records, ruling that medical providers and companies that provide medical records to the public may only charge the actual and reasonable expenses of reproducing the records, provided those expenses do…

Read More

Two New Workers’ Compensation Decisions Highlight the Fragility of Credibility Findings

In the last week, two Commonwealth Court opinions highlight the difference between the Court’s stated view – that it won’t overturn credibility findings supported in the record – and the reality that Courts do it all the time when they desire a specific result. One of the cases, Arvilla Oilfield…

Read More

Injured Workers Have Only 45 Days to Notify the Fund of an Uninsured Employer, Or They Won’t Receive Workers’ Comp Benefits

When we represent injured workers, we make sure that we notify the right parties so that our clients right to receive wage losses and payment for medical care is protected. A new Commonwealth Court opinion highlights why. Although injured workers have 3 years to file a Claim Petition, a literal…

Read More

Superior Court Addresses Issues of Commuting and Ridesharing Under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act

Numerous legal issues arise when employees are injured while commuting to work. In National Casualty Co. v. Kinney, the Superior Court (on April 25, 2014) addressed the issue of ridesharing. In particular, the Court held that an employee is not within the course and scope of his or her employment when commuting…

Read More