Appellate Decisions

Court Affirms the Concept of a De Facto NCP Under the Workers’ Compensation Act; Decision Perpetuates Procedural Concerns

One of the issues that periodically rears its head in claims under the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act is whether there exists such a concept as a de facto Notice of Compensation Payable (NCP). This is an important concept because an NCP provides an injured worker with certain rights, and we…

Read More

Read Important Appellate Court Decisions (from Pa., Florida & the U.S. Supreme Court) from March 2014

Our latest appellate newsletter, highlighting March 2014 published decisions from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Pennsylvania Superior Court, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, U.S. Supreme Court and Florida Supreme Court is now available. Just click here to read the latest case law on civil procedure (read the Pa. & U.S. Supreme court opinions),…

Read More

Superior Court Affirms That Commercial Vehicles Must Be Provided UM & UIM Benefits

The Superior Court has shed light on an issue that, while seemingly clear, remained in question -- whether Pennsylvania motor vehicle insurance carriers providing coverage for commercial fleets of vehicles were required to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage and, if so, whether policyholders were required to accept or reject…

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court & Florida Supreme Court Decisions May Have Significant Impact on Pennsylvania Civil Litigation & Damages

Two recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court may have a significant impact on Pennsylvania cases. In Daimler AG v. Bauman, No 11-965 (January 14, 2014), the U.S. Supreme Court stepped into the murky waters of jurisdiction, with a decision that will almost certainly limit…

Read More

Superior Court Affirms that Jurors May Be Dismissed for Cause When There is the Prospect or Appearance of Partiality or Bias

In Cordes v. Assocs. of Internal Medicine, a divided Superior Court affirmed that jurors may be struck for cause for various reasons, including: First, indirect relationships of a juror to a party with which the juror has had no direct contact, including connections through spouses with a potential (also indirect)…

Read More

Commonwealth Court Affirms Standards for IRE Physicians; Attorneys Molly Barker Gilligan and Dan Siegel Served as Co-Counsel

In Verizon v. WCAB (Ketterer), the Commonwealth Court ruled that a physician must have an active clinical practice, i.e., the physician must provide preventive care and the evaluation, treatment and management of medical conditions, at least 20 hours per week, in order to be qualified to perform Impairment Rating Evaluation…

Read More

New Commonwealth Court Case Highlights Issues With Subrogation in Workers’ Compensation Matters

The March 10, 2014 opinion by the Commonwealth Court in Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Chubb Corp. and Federal Insurance Co.) is noteworthy, not for a new or groundbreaking holding, but because the decision by Judge Cohn Jubelirer highlights how frequently the area of subrogation is misunderstood. It also highlights why…

Read More

Read the Latest Pennsylvania Appellate Case Law

Our latest appellate newsletter, highlighting February 2014 published decisions from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Pennsylvania Superior Court and Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, is now available. Just click here to read the latest case law on ethics, medical malpractice (jury instructions), workers' compensation and sovereign immunity. To receive our monthly newsletter summarizing…

Read More